Board Memo 004-2026: FY2026 NPA Indicators, Scaling, and Measurement Factors Executive Board, NAPS Headquarters received a letter for the USPS dated January 16, 2026, and received January 20, 2026, regarding the proposed Fiscal Year 2026 (FY26) National Performance Assessment. The attached letter includes proposed FY2026 NPA Indicators and additional information. The complete proposal will be … Read more
For EAS supervisors, managers, Headquarters employees and postmasters, this time of year is not just busy—it is a defining moment of leadership, dedication and service.
NAPS has actively engaged the USPS, extending Pay Talks in pursuit of more fair, reasonable, and impactful modifications to the proposed decision received on October 5, 2025.
As of the writing of this column, we are posting our first pay talks meeting with the USPS held on July 28 that resulted in an extension until Sept. 22
There are some in postal leadership who constantly pressure EAS employees to use their POV to do postal business. Why?
Throughout the past half-year, NAPS’ communications with its members have been consistent—engage with and persuade policymakers to reject proposed cuts
Renaming of the facility was passed by both the House and Senate in December 2024 and signed into law on January 4, 2025.
Upon review of the Inspector General (IG) for the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) “Flash Report” of July 2, NAPS immediately communicated its deep concern to the USPS and members of Congress
As previously mentioned, NAPS received notification from the USPS announcing plant rankings and staffing implementation
While there is much to unpack in this thorough, investigatory work put together by Hull and her team, I would like to look at the report beginning on page 22, “Senior Executive Investigations.”