Follow us! >

USPS OIG – Postal Automated Redirection System

Background

The Postal Automated Redirection System (PARS) was deployed in 2007 to handle letter mail that cannot be delivered to the name and address on the mailpiece. Mail sorting equipment can automatically intercept mail with an active Change of Address (COA), and PARS sorting equipment can forward it to the new destination, reducing additional mail handling. If mail that is undeliverable as addressed is not intercepted during the automated process, a carrier at the delivery unit can identify it as either forwardable — with a valid COA — or as return to sender and send it back to the plant for further processing. With the average American moving 11.7 times in their lifetime, the Postal Service must effectively handle PARS mail to ensure timely delivery of essential communications, such as bills, checks, and court documents.

What We Did

Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of procedures for processing and handling PARS mail. To accomplish our objective, we conducted interviews with U.S. Postal Service Headquarters management, obtained and analyzed PARS related data for fiscal years (FY) 2023 and 2024, and determined avoidable costs incurred due to identified issues.

What We Found

The Postal Service PARS mail does not have a service standard, which reduces the accountability and visibility for processing and delivering this mail to customers. Additionally, in FYs 2023 and 2024, delivery units improperly returned large volumes of undeliverable Marketing Mail (over 178 million), which should have been disposed of at the delivery unit, back to processing plants. They also improperly returned mail without a valid COA (over 449 million) back to processing plants – and since no updated address was identified when the mailpiece was run through the PARS sorting equipment, it was cycled back to the same delivery unit. These actions cost the Postal Service about $17.2 million and $95.5 million, respectively. Without further improvements to processes, we forecast an additional $124.5 million will be incurred in FYs 2025 and 2026. Finally, the Postal Service’s publicly available data for PARS mail was based on outdated information and was not reliable.

Recommendations and Management’s Comments

We made 11 recommendations to address the issues identified in the report. Postal Service management agreed with 10 recommendations and disagreed with one. Management’s comments and our evaluation are at the end of each finding and recommendation. Regardless of the disagreement, the U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General (OIG) considers management’s comments responsive to all recommendations as corrective actions should resolve the issues.

Sign up to receive our Daily Postal News blast

Related Articles

Tell us what you think below!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Hot this week

U.S. Postal Service worker strangled in Greater Grand Crossing had ‘heart of gold’

The suspect, whom Carolyn Jones recently kicked out of her home, was seen on video surveillance entering and leaving her apartment building in the 6800 block of South Calumet Avenue several times in the early morning hours of Nov. 26

USPS OIG – How a Single Point of Compromise Hurt Thousands of USPS Customers Across the Country

A mail carrier tried bankrolling his drug addiction by stealing mail, but by the time he wanted out of the wrong crowd he’d gotten into, it was too late.

The CFC’s power week begins

December kicks off with two red-letter days for the Combined Federal Campaign.

PMG David Steiner and several USPS employees participated in a Halloween celebration at the White House last month

The participating children and their parents could also visit booths, including a USPS station where the kids could write and mail letters and postcards and receive toy LLVs.

USPS facility in Boulder, Colorado was faulted for retaliating against a letter carrier after he announced his candidacy for union president

In general terms, the complaint alleges the USPS violated Section 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) of the Act by discriminating against the Charging Party, Terry Daniels (Daniels) by issuing him various discipline and refusing his transfer request in response to his union activities representing members as a shop steward.
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img
Secret Link
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x