Follow us! >

What the end of the de minimis exemption could mean for your online orders

If you’ve purchased something from Chinese e-commerce giants Shein, Temu or Alibaba, then you may have benefited from a trade loophole called the de minimis exemption.

The longstanding exemption allows packages valued at under $800 to enter the U.S. without being subject to tariffs. The goal was simple: The government would save the expense of processing a tariff fee that is lower than what it costs to collect it. Many other countries have similar exemptions, though the U.S. has one of the highest thresholds.
“It doesn’t make sense to spend a dollar trying to collect 50 cents worth of tariffs or duties,” said Clark Packard, a research fellow at the Cato Institute, a public policy think tank based in Washington, D.C.

As part of his escalating trade war with China, President Donald Trump signed an executive order this month ending the decades-old exemption on packages coming into the U.S. from China and Hong Kong. It goes into effect May 2.

Sign up to receive our Daily Postal News blast

Related Articles

Tell us what you think below!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Hot this week

Lower flags for Pearl Harbor Day

Postal Service facilities are required to fly the U.S. flag at half-staff this day.

The CFC’s power week begins

December kicks off with two red-letter days for the Combined Federal Campaign.

This postal employee noticed a customer’s mail piling up and took action

Letter Carrier Michael Cain was delivering mail in Park Falls, WI, recently when he noticed two days’ worth of mail in a customer’s mailbox.

Amazon explores cutting ties with USPS, building its own delivery network

Amazon has long been the Postal Service’s top customer, providing more than $6 billion in annual revenue to the agency in 2025.

USPS facility in Boulder, Colorado was faulted for retaliating against a letter carrier after he announced his candidacy for union president

In general terms, the complaint alleges the USPS violated Section 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) of the Act by discriminating against the Charging Party, Terry Daniels (Daniels) by issuing him various discipline and refusing his transfer request in response to his union activities representing members as a shop steward.
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img
Secret Link
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x