Court Says Postal Service Cannot Just Mail It In

The check is in the mail. This saying serves as the age-old excuse for payment not arriving on time—and a plausible one, considering that the U.S. Postal Service processes and delivers an average of 167 million pieces of mail per day.

Processing such a large volume of letters and packages requires an extensive workforce that is trained and well-supervised, which is why a recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit may have implications for people other than Washington, D.C. lawyers. In a case called National Association of Postal Supervisors v. United States Postal Service, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals addressed how the Postal Service pays those who supervise the mail’s processing and delivery, focusing on how the law controls decisions by federal agencies.

In its argument, the National Association of Postal Supervisors (NAPS) claimed that postal supervisors had been shortchanged by a Postal Service decision on pay rates. NAPS said that this discrepancy resulted from the Postal Service violating legal rules on how to set the supervisors’ pay. NAPS sued the Postal Service over its 2016–2019 pay package, which NAPS claimed did not provide a pay scale that would keep clerks from making more than managers and failed to consider private sector compensation and benefits.


CONTINUE READING AT » The Regulatory Review
Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Postal Supervisors are grossly over paid. We do the least amount of work per day. While mail and parcels pile up and get pushed back yet another day, routes go uncarried, we supervisors’ are outside smoking, deciding where to pick up lunch, stare at the phone while it rings off the hook, looking at our social media pages on postal computers, etc. NAPS thinks we need more pay? By all means pay us more, suckers!

Shares