The Supreme Court on Monday declined to allow the U.S. Postal Service to carry out parts of a new rule on mail-in voting. In a brief, unsigned order, the justices left in place a ruling by a federal judge in Boston that bars the USPS from implementing aspects of the rule.
Trump calls Supreme Court mail ballot ruling 'big loss for Republicans'
President Trump blasted his three Supreme Court appointees for blocking a Postal Service rule that would have allowed mail-in ballots in November's elections.
APWU Statement on Vote-by-Mail Supreme Court Ruling | American Postal Workers Union
Last night, in a 7-2 ruling, the Supreme Court ruled that President Trump’s executive order on Vote-by-Mail will not be in effect for the 2026 midterm elections, ensuring postal workers can continue to follow the procedures that have proven to work in the past. Postal workers will continue doing what they have done for more […]
Supreme Court ruling blocks administration from restricting mail-in ballots
On Monday, the Supreme Court rejected the administration’s plan to limit mail-in ballots nationwide.
NRLCA Statement on Preserving the Foundational Purpose of the United States Postal Service and its Role in Vote by Mail
Yesterday, the Supreme Court denied the administration’s request to stay two federal injunctions blocking the Postal Service’s mail ballot rule, leaving those injunctions in place and ensuring the rule will not take effect before the 2026 midterm elections. That is good news for the tens of millions of Americans who vote by mail: for this election, ballots will continue to be handled exactly as they always have been, under state administration, without Postal Service interference. It is good news that came only because three separate federal courts, the Supreme Court included, stepped in to stop the Postal Service from doing something it should never have attempted in the first place.
Add your first comment to this post