Follow us! >

Federal Register Notice of Additional Postmarking Information

On Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2025, the Postal Service filed a notice in the Federal Register with a proposal to add new language to the Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM). Specifically, the Postal Service proposes to add Section 608.11, “Postmarks and Postal Possession.” The proposed DMM addition does not signal a change in postmarking procedures.

This proposed language will serve multiple purposes. It will define postmarks, identify the types of Postal Service markings that qualify as postmarks, and describe the circumstances under which those markings are applied. It will also explain that, while the presence of a postmark (also known as a “cancellation”) on a mailpiece confirms that the Postal Service was in possession of the mailpiece on the date of the postmark’s inscription, the postmark date does not inherently or necessarily align with the date on which the Postal Service first accepted possession of a mailpiece. In addition, the proposed DMM language provides customers with the options available if they want evidence of the exact date on which the Postal Service first accepted possession of their mailpiece.

As stated, the Postal Service’s postmarking procedures are unchanged. Postmarks and cancellations will continue to be applied to single-piece First Class Mail pieces, both letter-shaped and flat-shaped, in the same manner and to the same extent as before.

Input from customers, government entities, industry stakeholders, and other interested parties is welcome, particularly regarding the interests that they and/or their constituents may have in postmark dating.

The Postal Service is also interested in feasible suggestions as to how any effect of this rulemaking on a commenter might be mitigated, including what information commenters believe would be helpful for the Postal Service to include, if not already captured, in the proposed DMM addition.

The Postal Service plans to engage in customer outreach and education efforts beyond the current notice and rulemaking proceeding. Recommendations regarding the Postal Service’s efforts — for instance, how to best reach the public, and/or any particular segments of the public — are welcome.

The full notice and information on how to submit comments are available here: Federal Register :: Postmarks and Postal Possession. Comments are due by Sept. 11, 2025.

Sign up to receive our Daily Postal News blast

Related Articles

Tell us what you think below!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Hot this week

Postal worker in Lantana alerts police after finding note from 81-year-old in mailbox; caretaker charged with elder abuse

An elderly man in Palm Beach County left a note in his mailbox that led to the arrest of his abusive caretaker. The note was short, but the message was urgent: Call the police.

USPS to release a 4-cent stamp – Angel’s Trumpets is the latest issue in floral series

The Postal Service will release Angel’s Trumpets, the latest stamp in its Low Denomination Flowers series, on Friday, Jan. 9.

Did USPS Discriminate by Demoting a Chinese American Postmaster and Replacing Her With a White Man?

In Lui v. DeJoy, the Ninth Circuit considered whether a demotion, followed by replacement with someone outside the employee’s protected class, can create an inference of discrimination strong enough to survive summary judgment

USPS Proposes Requiring Dimensions On All Commercial Parcels

If finalized, the rule would go into effect July 12, 2026 and require accurate package dimensions on commercial USPS parcels, regardless of size

USPS worker fell into coma, was denied workers’ comp and fired after inhaling dust at Georgia distribution facility

A USPS worker in Duluth, Georgia, has now contacted the rank-and-file committee about a horrific ongoing experience at the North Metro Processing & Distribution Center.
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

Secret Link
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Send this to a friend