Follow us! >

USPS OIG – Retail & Customer Service Operations Efficiency

Background

The U.S. Postal Service operates over 31,000 post offices and retail units where staff perform various operations, including scanning packages upon arrival or measuring mail. These Retail and Customer Service (i.e., function 4) operations accounted for 145 million workhours and $6.9 billion in costs in fiscal year 2023. The Postal Service’s ability to capture efficiencies, including through targeted operational reviews at selected units, can help drive its Delivering for America plan’s financial goals.

What We Did

Our objective was to assess the efficiency of Retail and Customer Service Operations nationwide. We assessed related policies and processes, observed operations at 12 units nationwide, analyzed performance data, and interviewed management and staff.

What We Found

While the Postal Service reported attaining its function 4 operational efficiency goal in fiscal year 2023, we identified concerns with key data that underlie these results. National data showed instances of misaligned mail volume and workhour data, such as mail volumes being processed with no workhours or workhours incurred with no reported mail volumes. This happened because staff did not always properly record their workhours. We observed similar conditions during our fieldwork, as well as instances of staff improperly measuring mail. These shortcomings, which occurred due to inadequate oversight, hinder the reliability of the underlying operational performance data, and could be mitigated with better system controls. We estimate $134 million of funds that could have been put to better use between October 2022 and March 2024.

We also found issues related to the management of its targeted operational reviews. First, the centralized system for recording these reviews did not track key performance elements or retain historical data. Second, the related policies are outdated, which may cause confusion among staff and hinder optimal site selection. Addressing these issues would enhance the impact of function 4 reviews, provide better operational and performance visibility, and help drive efficiencies and future cost savings.

Recommendations and Management’s Comments

We made five recommendations to address the issues identified in the report, and Postal Service management agreed with all five. We consider management’s comments responsive, as the corrective actions should resolve the issues. A summary of management’s comments and our evaluation are at the end of each finding and recommendation

Sign up to receive our Daily Postal News blast

Related Articles

Tell us what you think below!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Hot this week

Walkinshaw, Kaine, Warner Introduce Bill to Rename Fairfax Post Office in Honor of the late Gerry Connolly

Congressman James R. Walkinshaw (VA-11), U.S. Senators Tim Kaine (D-VA), and Mark Warner (D-VA) introduced bicameral legislation to rename a United States Postal Service facility in Fairfax, Virginia in honor of the late Congressman Gerald E. “Gerry” Connolly

NPMHU – 2025 Contract Update #11

You are reading the eleventh Contract Update produced and distributed by the NPMHU during the course of 2025 negotiations.

Amazon denies it is dropping US Postal Service

Without a doubt, our goal is to continue working with the USPS, as we have done for the past 30+ years, and are going to continue to push to reach an agreement."

Louisville residents say the USPS delays are back as holiday shipping season heats up

Louisville's main post office is once again facing complaints of mail delays despite a federal audit earlier this year that recommended changes at the facility.

Jewish NY postmaster grew, shaped USPS letters to Santa program in 1930s, ’40s

Goldman was the “father of the Santa Claus fund.” TIME recorded in 1941 that Goldman was “official opener of letters-to-Santa Claus.”
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img
Secret Link
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x