Follow us! >

The Post Office needs a better path forward by PRC Vice Chairman Thomas G Day

Postmaster General Louis DeJoy recently claimed in a Washington Post op-ed “We’re fixing the Postal Service.” He believes his “Delivering for America plan is the only comprehensive strategy in existence that can save the Postal Service … not just survive but thrive.” Given the complexity of the U.S. Postal Service, the variety of services it offers, the range of industries using these services, the 342 million customers at 167 million delivery points who are its recipients, as well as of the broad geography of our country, this is a complex issue.

There is more than one path forward.

Sign up to receive our Daily Postal News blast

Related Articles

Tell us what you think below!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Hot this week

In praise of the handwritten Christmas card

We’ve all come to dread checking the mail. And not just when property taxes are due.

When it comes to shipping this item, these precautions make scents

With the holiday season comes an increase in shipments of perfume, which is flammable and considered a hazardous material in the mailstream.

When slower mail becomes a health risk

Delivery speed and reliability are both essential to medication access. USPS has emphasized that the RTO initiative is intended to improve reliability, even as other elements of the DFA lengthens average delivery times.

10 Roads Express to shut down operations, end USPS contracts

The 10 Roads group of companies — one of the largest U.S. mail haulers — announced Monday it will wind down all operations over the next 60 days and cease service to the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) by Jan. 30

This is the season for online shopping scams

The Postal Service is reminding employees and contractors that online shopping scams are a widespread threat during the holiday season.
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img
Secret Link
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x